Are you a journalist or university researcher who wants to dig deep into Washington State criminal justice issues in a way that will address systemic needs? We are compiling a detailed list of proposed multidisciplinary research questions to give journalists and academics ideas that will help fill areas of research need, along with resources on how to file public records requests and locate existing public data and information. Thank you to all who consider taking on some of these questions!
Prison Voice Washington is keeping in touch with families of those incarcerated at Coyote Ridge Corrections Center as prisoners there continue a hunger strike in protest of the Correctional Industries factory food system. Concerns about the food appear to be consistent with complaints at several other prisons in Washington State: nutritional quality of the food fails to comply with the standards of the DOH Healthy Nutrition Guidelines, as required by Executive Order 13-06, and the cold “breakfast boats” (bagged breakfasts) are heavy in refined carbohydrates and deficient in fresh fruit and protein. The primary sources of protein in these breakfast boats are small powdered milk packets and packets of hydrogenated-oil packed peanut butter. The Washington Department of Corrections and its revenue branch, Correctional Industries, have received ongoing pressure from many stakeholder groups and public officials since the Prison Voice Washington report on the DOC-CI food model came out in 2016. In response, DOC and CI have promised to reinstate more nutritious hot breakfasts served in dining halls at all prisons in the state over the next couple of years, phasing out the nutritionally deficient bagged breakfasts served cold in prison cells. This process has already begun at Washington State Penitentiary in response to an April 2018 hunger strike at that facility. Monroe Correctional Complex is slated to be the next facility to have hot breakfasts reinstated, though we have yet to see what negotiations might occur between DOC and those incarcerated at Coyote Ridge who are tired of waiting for healthy food in sufficient quantities, as mandated by Executive Order 13-06.
Washington Appleseed recently unveiled their comprehensive Washington Reentry Guide for formerly incarcerated people. Now they are collaborating with members of Prison Voice Washington and the Statewide Family Council to build a similar toolkit for families surviving incarceration in Washington State. On September 25, 2018, I gave a speech at the Good Apple Luncheon on the needs of families of the incarcerated. The text of this speech is reproduced below.
I’m Loretta Rafay, co-chair of the Statewide Family Council and policy researcher for Prison Voice Washington. My husband has been incarcerated for over twenty years, and I joined him on that journey three years ago. Also here with me today is my fellow Statewide Family Council member, Melody Simle, whose brother has been incarcerated for 10 years, and who will soon support her brother through the reentry process. As her family prepares for reentry, Melody thinks back to ten years’ of missed holidays and birthdays with her brother. Their family has felt a deep sense of loss during his absence. His incarceration has also been financially devastating for some of his family. On top of exorbitant attorney fees, his wife of twenty years, who had been a homemaker prior to his arrest, was thrown into utter poverty when he was incarcerated. His wife was middle-aged and had health issues that prevented her from driving the many hours to the prison to visit him. Outside of food stamps and meagre financial aid from DSHS, there were no resources to help her survive, and she relied on Melody and other family members for support. Ultimately, the marriage ended in divorce.
As Melody’s brother gets closer to release, their family prepares by setting aside money to repair his teeth and physical health after a decade of inadequate prison healthcare. They feel poorly equipped to support him in his emotional transition from prison into the Free World. In some ways, Melody’s brother is more fortunate than most because he has a family home to return to and will not encounter the housing barriers most experience during reentry. Yet even with a strong support network, he will struggle with the post traumatic stress associated with incarceration. His family might vacillate between empathy and impatience if he can’t function in the Free World. What if he gets depressed and just lies on the couch? What if he can’t seem to get back into a normal work schedule?
This sort of story is disturbingly common in Washington State. As families try to survive incarceration, they are left to sink or swim, both financially and emotionally. We’d like to thank Angeline and Washington Appleseed for acknowledging our struggles and offering to help. We’ve come here today to share with you what kind of support we need as our families survive incarceration.
There are around 20,000 incarcerated people in the Washington State prison system, and this doesn’t include those under federal or county jurisdictions. These thousands of people may be supported by a broad range of biological and chosen family members, if the stress of incarceration does not result in estrangement from family. As indisputable research shows, our prison visiting rooms are places where parents, siblings, spouses, cousins, children, and friends of the incarcerated help improve recidivism outcomes, one visit at a time, against all odds, and with minimal support.
Families of the incarcerated typically are not recognized as secondary victims when a crime occurs. The public is rarely sympathetic to their plight. Thus, families do time along with their incarcerated loved ones. Family members must also wear multiple hats to support their incarcerated loved ones. In addition to being breadwinners and emotional supports, they must spend countless hours every month on phone calls and emails to hold prison staff accountable for providing basic services and humane treatment. Without family support, incarcerated people are treated with apathy at best and contempt at worst, and are left to fall through the cracks in every possible way.
The emotional and financial burden of this secondary incarceration hits families hard. Imagine a mother and father who have driven from Everett all the way to Walla Walla to visit their incarcerated son. It is Christmas Day and they haven’t seen him for three months. They encounter snowstorms as they drive east, adding considerable time to their drive. They arrive at the prison three minutes past the last call for visiting check-in. The mother pleads with the prison staff to make an exception and let them process in late, but rules are rules, and the officer does not budge. There is no sign in the lobby informing the mother and father that this officer is of the lowest rank, and that visitors have the right to request intervention from a sergeant or lieutenant. All the parents see is the intimidating uniform worn by a person of authority. They walk out to their car with heavy hearts and drive back across the mountains.
The burdens of incarceration tend to fall the heaviest on women in the family. This is especially true in disproportionately impacted communities, which may be hit multiple times by incarceration, within and across generations, often leaving one female breadwinner to support an entire extended family. I know a mother who is raising both her grandchildren and her nephew’s children because incarceration has been the fate of more than one young man in her family. I know another woman who spends her entire weekend visiting at two different prisons that are a two-hour drive apart because both her son and her husband are incarcerated.
Supporting a loved one through incarceration is becoming a larger burden on men in the family as well. Women are the fastest growing incarcerated population in our state, and it is no longer uncommon to hear of husbands becoming the primary nurturer for the entire family when their wives or daughters are incarcerated. Imagine a husband who is raising his two children alone. The youngest child, Marta, is seven and the oldest, Fabi, is nine. Their mother was arrested almost two years ago and for all that time they have only been able to visit her behind glass at the county jail. Now she has been sentenced and is housed at the women’s prison in Gig Harbor. When Fabi and Marta get to have their first contact visit with their mother, both girls want to sit on her lap and hug her tightly. However, Fabi is told that only her little sister can do so. Fabi, who has passed the cutoff age of eight, is now considered old enough to have to follow adult rules of affection in the visiting room. This is confusing and upsetting to Fabi, who now resents her little sister Marta for getting to share more affection with their mother during their three-hour visit.
Families of the incarcerated struggle with inhospitable prison visiting room environments that provide no sense of normalcy for family or marital relationships. We stand in long lines with other families to visit our loved ones and are pushed deeper and deeper into debt by private companies that contract with the Department of Corrections. These costs add up to thousands of dollars each year and can exacerbate the resentment families may find themselves feeling toward their incarcerated loved ones.
I know a woman in the peak of her youth whose husband is serving a lengthy sentence. He has no family other than her, and she has to be absolutely everything to him. She is his amateur paralegal when he files pro se petitions, and when her grad school peers go out on Friday nights, she has date night at the prison. She sleeps alone every night and stresses out on weekend mornings trying to find something to wear to the prison that complies with Puritanical dress codes but doesn’t make her feel completely ugly. When she arrives at the prison, the vending card loading machine eats her last twenty dollar bill and she has to borrow money from another visitor just to buy food for her husband. She feels somewhat happier when she enters the visiting room and sees his smiling face, but then a correctional officer walks by her table three different times to tell her she is holding hands with her husband at “the wrong angle.” She feels helpless, dissatisfied, and irritated, and a marital argument ensues with no privacy at all. She leaves visiting early in frustration, and when her husband tries to call her later to console her, they hear the recorded Global Tel Link voice saying, “Your AdvancePay account has a low balance. Please add funds now to accept more calls.”
For many incarcerated people, families are the only reentry plan. Yet support for families as they try to survive is lacking. The Department of Corrections Family Services Unit has six staff members to serve the families of 20,000 incarcerated people. Their work focuses primarily on children of the incarcerated, with few services for other types of family relationships. Families are unaware of what additional support might be available to them in the community. Where resources exist at all, they are fragmented and poorly advertised.
Families need a comprehensive toolkit that links them to resources, both during and after a loved one’s incarceration, to help them survive emotionally and financially. We are immensely grateful to Washington Appleseed for noticing our plight, and for taking tangible and meaningful steps to help alleviate our burdens by designing such a toolkit. We look forward to ongoing work with Angeline and all of you on this important area of need.
Prison Voice Washington has received many requests for interviews lately in light of the recent hunger strike at Washington State Penitentiary. We thought this might be a good time to present a timeline of our work on Washington’s state prison food system, as well as a few updates. Here is our chronological account:
• October 30, 2013 – Governor Jay Inslee signs Executive Order 13-06 requiring access to healthy foods in state agencies and institutions for employees and custodial populations
• February 2014 – Former Dietary Services Manager, Brent Carney, represents WA DOC in the Department of Health’s Food Procurement Workgroup to create and disseminate the Washington State DOH Healthy Nutrition Guidelines, which includes an Implementation Guide for Institutions
• 2015 – DOC makes scheduled biennual revisions to internal food and beverage policies. Although EO 13-06 required state agencies to adopt internal policies acknowledging the executive order by 2014, and although DOH provided a model policy template for institutions in 2014, DOC only adopted a new policy for their employee food and beverage policy, DOC 200.190. Meanwhile, as of April 23, 2018, policy DOC 240.100 and Attachment I Guidelines for Mainline Meals for incarcerated people still reflects no acknowledgement of the applicability of the order to custodial populations, despite having been revised in 2015.
• March 2016 – Prison Voice Policy Researcher Loretta Rafay meets with Brent Carney to discuss DOC’s food system. Carney gives Loretta handouts about EO 13-06 and discusses his involvement with the Food Procurement Workgroup on meals for the incarcerated, demonstrating his awareness of and involvement with EO 13-06 implementation.
• October 2016
Statewide Family Council members from four Washington prison facilities (WSP, WCCW, CCCC, and MCC) meet with Correctional Industries and Brent Carney to discuss the prison food system and present a list of recommended commissary foods and proposed action items to improve the prison food system.
Family members provide CI staff with Halloween pails containing the Prison Voice WA prison food report and healthy non-perishable foods families of the incarcerated would like to see added to prison commissaries. After this meeting, Loretta Rafay begins working with the Department of Health, Brent Carney, and Correctional Industries to add some healthy non-perishable foods to the prison commissaries. This working group makes meaningful progress and establishes a foundation for DOC and DOH to collaborate on prison food issues. (See summary notes and commissary product sales report .)
• November 2016 – Some prisons in Washington State begin replacing hot meals served to incarcerated people in visiting rooms with cold bagged Correctional Industries meals containing processed sugary foods (jelly, cookies) and potato chips, along with a small bag of carrots and a tiny apple. Despite encouraging local facilities to provide hot meals to prisoners in visiting rooms in a December 2015 memo, then Assistant Secretary (now Secretary) Steve Sinclair wrote in an email to families of the incarcerated: “The reasoning had nothing to do with convenience or cost saving and was motivated [sic] a need to increase security practices to reduce contraband. Anytime we take something from outside (e.g. visiting) and move it back inside the secure perimeter it creates an avenue for folks to move contraband.” (The puzzling rationale is why moving a hot meal in and out of a visiting room supposedly creates more contraband risk than moving a cold meal in and out. And the meal is eaten so actually never moves back outside of the visiting room. Any trash is disposed of in the visiting room garbage cans. Moreover, all kinds of objects move in and out of the visiting rooms all the time. Garbage cans, staff lunch boxes, vending machine carts, etc.)
• May 2017 – An updated prison mainline menu analysis shows that DOC still is not compliant with required vegetable servings. (As of April 23, 2018, these deficiencies are still about the same. DOC is also only providing prisoners with one serving of powdered milk per day when the DOH Healthy Nutrition Guidelines require three.)
• July 17, 2017 – Moldy carrots found in a Correctional Industries cold bagged meal served to a prisoner in the Washington State Reformatory visiting room. Loretta Rafay received permission from the WSRU visiting Lieutenant to take the carrots to DOC leadership at a Statewide Family Council meeting the following day. Notice the white liquid created by the mold that has pooled in the bottom of the package.
• July 27, 2017 -DOC’s internal ombudsman, Carlos Lugo, responds via mail to an ombuds request filed by prisoner Atif Rafay concerning DOC’s failure both to update DOC 240.100 and to fully comply with EO 13-06. In this letter Lugo concludes that DOC is in violation of EO 13-06, but “failed to understand that it was obligated to apply the order to meals for incarcerated individuals.” As part of the investigation process for this ombuds complaint, Lugo interviewed Brent Carney and Correctional Industries food procurement staff, and surely must have been told about DOC’s documented participation in the Food Procurement Workgroup.
• April 11, 2018 – DOC leadership posts a memo in prison living units at Washington State Penitentiary in response to prisoner hunger strikes. This memo states that DOC will begin providing hot oatmeal and milk cartons at breakfast. It fails to truly acknowledge DOC non-compliance with Executive Order 13-06. It also claims that the current Correctional Industries factory food model provides more nutritious food than DOC’s locally sourced fresh scratch-cooked meals provided over a decade ago.
• April 23, 2018 – A Prison Voice interview with a Washington State prisoner reveals that ten years ago Washington prisoners received unprocessed chicken, salmon, and open salad bar access at meals. Unlimited milk was provided at breakfast. This nutritious diet supported the mental health stability that makes prisons safer for both the incarcerated and the staff that monitor them.
The latest news from DOC headquarters is that over the next two years, all facilities will gradually eliminate breakfast boats and return to hot breakfasts served in dining areas. Monroe Correctional Complex will be the next facility to make this change, according to Assistant Secretary Robert Herzog. DOC has to make major changes to staff scheduling to go back to the old (and healthier) system. We will post additional updates as we have more information.
It has been several months since Prison Voice Washington released its report on food policy in Washington prisons. In that time, we have had some success, though much more needs to be done. Prison Voice members and the incarcerated have worked with DOC’s Statewide Family Council, DOC’s dietician, Correctional Industries, DOC’s internal ombudsman, and Washington’s Department of Health on the following:
- Creation of an ongoing commissary working group that has thus far added over ten new healthy food items to Washington State prison commissaries.
- Establishing a concrete timeline for DOC to update its policies governing mainline and closed loop meals for the incarcerated to reflect a duty to comply with Executive Order 13-06.
- Establishing a 2018 deadline for compliance with Executive Order 13-06. However, Correctional Industries has stated that DOC will need to appeal to the legislature for supplementary budget allocations before full compliance can be achieved.
- Improving the vegetable offerings in mainline and closed loop meals, though more needs to be done for DOC to be in full compliance with Executive Order 13-06.
Are you a prison reform advocate outside of Washington state who would like to do some work on your state’s prison food system? Here are some tips to help you in your valiant uphill battle:
- Federal case law on prison food standards is abysmal. Thus, you may have more success looking to your state laws and state Department of Health for legitimacy and support. Find out exactly which Department of Health staff and governor’s policy advisors work on state nutrition and food policies and call or email them. Find out what state executive orders, state legislation, and nutrition guidelines have been passed/established in your state, and cite key language from these documents in letters to your Department of Corrections, legislators, governor’s policy advisors, etc. You may also wish to cite language from the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, as well as USDA nutrition standards, including the USDA Smart Snacks guidelines for public schools. The public school food system faces some of the same challenges that our prison systems face, and can be a good source of ideas for how to address systemic problems.
- Get contact information for the dietician of your state’s Department of Corrections. Request more information and a meeting with that person.
- Put in a public records request with your Department of Corrections to obtain prison meal menus, food ingredient labels, order forms listing commissary and food package offerings, etc. This sort of documentation is helpful to have when discussing concerns with legislators or writing reports like ours on your state’s prison food system.
- Does your state’s Department of Corrections have a Correctional Industries that runs the prison food system? If so, request a meeting with the CI staff in charge of making food purchasing decisions. If possible, request that someone from your Department of Health attend the meeting as well, and request that a collaborative working group be established with representatives from DOH, DOC, and prison reform advocates.
- If you are the family member of an incarcerated person, find out if your state’s Department of Corrections has a Family Services Unit or a Family Council that can help you communicate with DOC on this issue. If your state’s DOC does not offer a family council, look to the Family Council policies of Washington and California’s prison system, and get help from your DOC’s Family Services Unit in establishing a Family Council. Family Councils get to meet with high level DOC administrators and can do some meaningful work with DOC on important issues. Be persistent, and don’t be afraid to communicate higher and higher up the DOC chain of command on this issue.
- Contact expert nutritionists at universities and colleges in your state and ask for their help in advocating for improved prison nutrition standards.
- Network with state and national food policy advocacy groups
- Research efforts to link local farms with various public food programs in your state
Check back here for future updates on the work we are doing in Washington state!
Tom Jacobs has served for several years on the Washington Corrections Center for Women Local Family Council, and recently retired from representing his local council at the Washington Department of Corrections Statewide Family Council. As his wife nears her release date, he is thinking back to what her incarceration has meant for him, his family, and the holiday season.
It’s another Holiday Season where families gather about with spirits of great joy. There is the smell of a turkey or ham emanating from the oven while the chatter of relatives and friends greeting each other comes from the front door. It is not the same warm greeting in every home, though, because in some family members won’t be together for years.
We watch the news each evening of someone being assaulted, a store or home broken into, or a car hitting a pedestrian in the street, and begin to think the worst of the people who would do these things. We follow them through the courts and soon they are sentenced to 3, 5, or whatever number of years and thank God, one more criminal off the streets.
That’s fine if it ended there but it never does. We seem to forget the families that are waiting outside of the prison walls and the hardships and grief they must be going through over the next several years. This is a subject that I know something about because I have lived through it for the past seven and a half years.
I would like to think that we were a normal family; we raised three wonderful children, were very active in community affairs, donated to the food bank, belonged to the PTA, and were involved in all the kids’ activities. Our children were all grown up and had homes of their own, while I, being retired, was thinking about enjoying my pastime, fishing.
It came as a surprise to me when the police knocked on our door one evening and asked to talk to my wife. She went up to the police station and a few hours later returned home to tell me that she has been arrested for stealing from the company where she worked. While the district attorney investigated the crime, it took two years before she finally had her day in court. Friends that we had in our neighborhood for thirty years who had promised to be by our side and support us through this ordeal no longer called on us. I had lost the use of my leg a couple years before and could no longer take care of our home on my own, so we sold the house to cover court costs and to lower our cost of living.
To avoid family embarrassment for the kids’ sake, my wife went into court and pleaded guilty and took her punishment as the court deemed fit. It shocked me when the judge sentenced her to seven and a half years because I had seen on the news where prominent individuals had stolen millions of dollars but served nowhere near this much time, and where murder convictions would get less time.
The first time I went to the prison to visit my wife, I felt a lot of apprehension because this was a whole new world to me. I did not know what to expect. As I walked through the front door a gentleman came up to me and said he was on the Family Council and was there to help me in any way he could. Explaining the rules of what was allowed in visiting, he showed me where to sign in and lock up my valuables. We were not allowed to bring cash into the institution but they did have machines for purchasing drinks and snacks. He showed me how to put my money in a machine to obtain a canteen card which we could use to purchase snacks. He then escorted me over to security check-in and explained the procedure for removing our jackets, belts and shoes before walking through the metal detector. The guards would check each item for contraband before handing them back to us. There were several other people already in a holding area as I put my belt, shoes and jacket back on.
Eventually a guard came in and escorted the group to the visiting room, which was about fifty yards away in another building. There was a gate between us and the building and we had to wait before a buzzer sounded and the gate lock opened up to let us through. I remember looking up at the high fence surrounding us and the concertina wire on top and along the bottom, and how sensitive it made me feel. The group came to a halt at the closed entrance of the building and we waited for another buzzer to unlock that door. When the buzzer sounded, we all filed in before the door slammed shut behind us with what I considered to be an ominous sound. But we weren’t in yet because in front of us was another door, where we had to wait for another buzzer to sound before we could go through. When we finally entered the visiting room, two guards sitting at a table checked us in and assigned each of us to a table to visit with our loved ones.
Each weekend I would visit my wife and would be greeted at the door by a Family Council member. I soon realized that they too were individuals with a friend or family member incarcerated. It didn’t take me long to become familiar with the routine of checking in, and as we waited to be escorted I would talk to other people waiting in line. From this I learned a lot about the unspoken hardships they acquired when their family members ran afoul of the law. Some had to travel from hundreds of miles away—even from out of state—to see their daughter or wife, and had little money to cover expenses.
An elderly lady came up from Oregon with her unemployed son and stayed at a cheap motel on South Tacoma way so she could visit her daughter. Her son looked for work and never seemed to pay that much attention to his mother, but would drive her over whenever he could and pick her up later when he felt like it. One day he didn’t show up to take her home and I told her that I would pick her up and bring her over each weekend because I passed her motel each time I came over. One day she said her daughter was getting out Monday so she wouldn’t need a ride anymore. Her daughter did get out Monday but the mother had passed away the Sunday before.
I learned more and more about the Family Council and all the good they did to help individuals who came to visit, and soon realized that I wanted to be part of that group. In order to address the numerous problems that came up within the prison system locally and statewide , the Department of Corrections established and maintained Family Councils at each institution to advise, collaborate, and problem solve in partnership with the Department and the community.
I signed up for the local Family Council and was accepted. For the next seven years I was able to help others coming in to the prison for the first time. Eventually, after four years, I was asked to represent the local Family Council at the Statewide Family Council level.
At Statewide Family Council, we discussed, reviewed and even presented different programs to help families and inmates bond closer together to cut back on recidivism.
Whenever you think of an individual being incarcerated, also think of their families and the hardships that they have to endure, not only emotionally, but physically and financially, due to no fault of their own. Extend a hand to help not only the inmates who have served their time upon their release so they endeavor to remain free, but also to the families to work through their hardships.
My time is ending soon when my wife gets out on January fourth and we are together again permanently. It might be a belated Christmas for us but one we will celebrate in a family way.
Yesterday (11/2/2016), Washington Department of Corrections Secretary Dick Morgan sent out the below email to all DOC staff, marking the official end of the use of the word “offender”. DOC had already eliminated this word on its website a few months back (hence the many broken links now one encounters when Googling certain phrases from the old DOC website). This is a HUGE moment for incarcerated people, their families, and the community groups that serve them. Since the inception of the Statewide Family Council almost a decade ago, families of Washington’s incarcerated have been pushing DOC to end the official and verbal use of this word. Prison Voice Washington hopes this shift in terminology marks a shift in attitude as well: our incarcerated people are not offensive, and should not be labeled or treated as such. We applaud Secretary Morgan for taking what may be the first step in changing the mass incarceration attitude in Washington state.
Good afternoon –
The Washington Department of Corrections is phasing out the use of the word “offender.” The Department switched from ‘inmate’ to ‘offender’ in the early 2000’s as a more general term to describe the men and women in our care and custody whether they were assigned to a prison, work release, or supervised in the field.
As a technical term describing the people for whom we are legally responsible, the word “offender” worked. It worked so well that it is embedded in nearly every policy, document, or system associated with our Department. However, the word “offender” has also contributed significantly to some unintended consequences. The word ‘offender’ has become a label that we apply to people and in our case, the people for which we are charged to provide services and everything associated with them. Unfortunately, what starts out as a technical term, used to generically describe the people in our care, becomes and is enforced as a stereotype. As a stereotype, “offender” is a label that impacts more than the person to whom it is applied. This label has now been so broadly used that it is not uncommon to see it used to describe others such as “offender families” and “offender employers or services.”
This is not a malicious act on the part of our Department or the public, but the term “offender” does have a negative connotation and significantly impacts a broad group of people and communities. This is something we can address. When I started work in corrections the term “resident” had been adopted to replace “convict” and “inmate.” Inmate was reinstituted in the early 80’s to be followed by “offender.” Times change, and so does our language.
Effective November 1, 2016, we will be phasing out the word “offender.” This will take some time to fully accomplish, but you will begin to see the word “offender” replaced with “individuals” or other applicable terms such as “student” or “patient” where/when appropriate. Policies and other documents will be modified as they come up for review. We have many systems and proprietary tools that use the word “offender” and those will take much longer to address, but we need to start somewhere. It takes time to change habits but I encourage all of you to make an effort. Start by referring to individuals by their names (if you don’t already), practice replacing or removing the word ‘offender’ from your communication and presentations to others. Most importantly, take this as an opportunity to help others define themselves not for their criminal behavior, but for their future role in their communities.
Thank you for your efforts,
Richard “Dick” Morgan
Washington State Department of Corrections
7345 Linderson Way SW, Tumwater, WA 98501-6504